Unwrapped

Teardown · amperos

AMPEROS

AMPEROS

CategoryHealthcare RCMLast round · $16M · 2026Site ↗

EHR claim data + payor portal access + LLM APIs + RCM workflows.

01

Public data / API layer

EHR systems (Epic, Athena, NextGen, eCW)
EHR systems (Epic, Athena, NextGen, eCW)Yours
ICD-10 diagnosis codes
ICD-10 diagnosis codesPublic
CPT/HCPCS procedure codes
CPT/HCPCS procedure codesLicensed
Insurance payor portals
Insurance payor portalsAPI
Historical denial data
Historical denial dataYours

Internal replication score

Medium
0.59

Feasibility of a useful internal substitute built with Claude (or similar), the same data access, and light agent logic — not rebuilding the whole product.

IRS = 0.30·D + 0.25·L + 0.20·O + 0.15·R + 0.10·Sthis record · 59%
  • D

    Data accessibility

    weight 0.300.65
    • 1.0mostly customer-owned / public / standard third-party sources
    • 0.5mixed accessibility
    • 0.0hard-to-access or proprietary source layer
  • L

    LLM substitutability

    weight 0.250.70
    • 1.0mostly retrieve / prompt / cite / summarize / classify / compare
    • 0.5mixed standard + custom behavior
    • 0.0strongly custom model behavior (fine-tunes on proprietary data, etc.)
  • O

    Output simplicity

    weight 0.200.50
    • 1.0straightforward internal work product (memo, list, reply, SQL query)
    • 0.5moderately specialized
    • 0.0highly specialized (e.g. FDA-graded clinical text)
  • R

    Review / risk tolerance

    weight 0.150.40
    • 1.0internal use with human review is acceptable
    • 0.5moderate risk
    • 0.0very low tolerance for error (e.g. external legal filings)
  • S

    Surface complexity

    weight 0.10inverse — higher means less surface dependence0.55
    • 1.0a simple internal shell is enough
    • 0.5polished workflow matters somewhat
    • 0.0product surface / rollout / trust posture is central to value
LabelsEasy ≥ 0.67Medium ≥ 0.34Hard < 0.34

Missing factor rows use heuristics from wrapper scores. Editorial heuristic, not investment advice.

Build it yourself

Recreate the workflow inside your org.

Internal build

Build it yourself

Same EHR data + Claude + workflow orchestration — requires RCM domain knowledge and portal integrations.

Internal use only. Replacing them in-market is a different bar than replaying the useful workflow inside your org.

01 · Connectors & flow

EHR systems (Epic, Athena, NextGen, eCW)
EHR systems (Epic, Athena, NextGen, eCW)
ICD-10 diagnosis codes
ICD-10 diagnosis codes
CPT/HCPCS procedure codes
CPT/HCPCS procedure codes
Insurance payor portals
Insurance payor portals
Historical denial data
Historical denial data

Internal build map

Data in

Connectors
Connectors

Agent layer

Planner
Tools + retrieval
Reasoning model

Logic

LLM API
retrieve
classify
prioritize
route
automate portals
not custom weights

Outputs

Internal search
Answer
Citations

02 · Claude / agent prompt

Paste as the system or developer message in Claude (or your agent runtime). Scroll to read; Copy grabs the full text.

Claude / agent prompt

// Revenue cycle management denial classifier and routing agent You are a denial management assistant inside [YOUR_HEALTHCARE_ORG]'s revenue cycle team. You help billers and coders process insurance claim denials using ONLY claim data from the EHR, payor correspondence, and standard medical coding references (ICD-10, CPT/HCPCS). ## What you must do 1. Retrieve first: Pull claim details, denial reason codes, payor correspondence, and any prior submission history before generating a response. 2. Classify denials: Categorize denial type (coding error, missing documentation, timely filing, authorization, medical necessity, etc.) based on denial reason codes. 3. Recommend action: Suggest next steps (resubmit with corrected codes, attach documentation, file appeal, escalate to specialist). 4. Prioritize: Flag high-dollar claims, timely filing deadlines, and repeated denial patterns. 5. Cite rigorously: Reference specific denial codes, claim line items, and payor policy sections. ## What you are not Not a replacement for certified medical coders or appeals specialists — all recommendations require review by RCM staff. Internal workflow tool only. ## Refusal Refuse if asked to override payor policy, backdate claims, or fabricate documentation. If claim context is incomplete, request the missing information (prior auth documents, clinical notes, etc.). ## Safety Internal use only. All resubmissions and appeals must be reviewed by a human biller before submission. Flag any claim that requires legal or compliance review.

03 · Result

Claim denied for lack of medical necessity — CPT 99214 with diagnosis M54.5. What should we do?
ICD-10 + payor policy

Resubmit with more specific diagnosis code. Attach clinical notes showing evaluation complexity. Consider upgrading to M54.50 with laterality.