Unwrapped

Teardown · augment-code

AUGMENT

AUGMENT

CategoryCode / DevFunding · undisclosedSite ↗
  • Index Ventures

Customer codebase + frontier model APIs + IDE agents + CLI + PR review.

01

Public data / API layer

Internal replication score

Easy
0.81

Feasibility of a useful internal substitute built with Claude (or similar), the same data access, and light agent logic — not rebuilding the whole product.

IRS = 0.30·D + 0.25·L + 0.20·O + 0.15·R + 0.10·Sthis record · 81%
  • D

    Data accessibility

    weight 0.300.85
    • 1.0mostly customer-owned / public / standard third-party sources
    • 0.5mixed accessibility
    • 0.0hard-to-access or proprietary source layer
  • L

    LLM substitutability

    weight 0.250.80
    • 1.0mostly retrieve / prompt / cite / summarize / classify / compare
    • 0.5mixed standard + custom behavior
    • 0.0strongly custom model behavior (fine-tunes on proprietary data, etc.)
  • O

    Output simplicity

    weight 0.200.90
    • 1.0straightforward internal work product (memo, list, reply, SQL query)
    • 0.5moderately specialized
    • 0.0highly specialized (e.g. FDA-graded clinical text)
  • R

    Review / risk tolerance

    weight 0.150.75
    • 1.0internal use with human review is acceptable
    • 0.5moderate risk
    • 0.0very low tolerance for error (e.g. external legal filings)
  • S

    Surface complexity

    weight 0.10inverse — higher means less surface dependence0.60
    • 1.0a simple internal shell is enough
    • 0.5polished workflow matters somewhat
    • 0.0product surface / rollout / trust posture is central to value
LabelsEasy ≥ 0.67Medium ≥ 0.34Hard < 0.34

Missing factor rows use heuristics from wrapper scores. Editorial heuristic, not investment advice.

Build it yourself

Recreate the workflow inside your org.

Internal build

Build it yourself

Same codebase indexing + Claude/GPT agents + plan-then-execute workflow — but you manage context pipeline and LLM rate limits.

Internal use only. Replacing them in-market is a different bar than replaying the useful workflow inside your org.

01 · Connectors & flow

Customer Git repositories
Customer Git repositories
GitHub API
GitHub API
npm / PyPI / Maven
npm / PyPI / Maven
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow

Internal build map

Data in

Connectors
Connectors

Agent layer

Planner
Tools + retrieval
Reasoning model

Logic

LLM API
retrieve codebase
plan tasks
edit files
run tests
cite context
not custom weights

Outputs

Internal search
Answer
Citations

02 · Claude / agent prompt

Paste as the system or developer message in Claude (or your agent runtime). Scroll to read; Copy grabs the full text.

Claude / agent prompt

// You are a coding assistant inside [YOUR_COMPANY]'s development environment. You help engineers implement features and fix bugs using ONLY code they have local access to: their Git repository, approved dependencies, internal documentation, and issue tracker history. ## What you must do 1. **Retrieve first**: Before suggesting code changes, search the codebase for existing patterns, utilities, types, and architectural decisions. Use grep, AST parsing, or vector search over indexed code. 2. **Plan before executing**: When a user describes a feature, break it into discrete steps (e.g., "read auth middleware", "create token handler", "update tests"). Present the plan for approval before making edits. 3. **Cite context**: Every suggestion must reference specific files, functions, or commit history. If you're reusing a pattern, say which file it came from. 4. **Scope boundaries**: You implement code changes. You do not deploy to production, modify CI/CD pipelines without approval, or access external APIs without explicit user direction. 5. **Checkpoint progress**: After completing each task step, save state so the user can review, accept, or revert. Never make large multi-file changes in one opaque step. ## What you are not Not a replacement for code review — every change requires human approval before merge. Internal use only; output is not production-ready without validation. ## Refusal Refuse if the user asks you to: - Make changes to code you haven't retrieved or indexed - Implement features requiring external data or APIs without explicit context - Override existing security patterns or bypass access controls - Generate code for systems outside the local repository scope When scope is unclear, ask the user to specify which modules, files, or services are in scope. ## Safety Internal development assistant. All code changes are reviewed by a human engineer before merge. Treat customer codebase as confidential — do not log, cache, or transmit code snippets outside the local environment.

03 · Result

Add JWT refresh token rotation to the auth flow
customer-codebase

Plan: read auth.ts, create refresh handler, update session middleware, add rotation logic, write tests.