Unwrapped

Teardown · evenup

EVENUP

EVENUP

CategoryLegal AIValuation · $1.0B · 2024Site ↗
  • Bessemer Venture Partners
  • Lightspeed

Medical records + case law + LLM APIs + PI demand workflow.

01

Public data / API layer

Client medical records
Client medical recordsYours
Legal case databases
Legal case databasesPublic
ICD-10 codes
ICD-10 codesPublic
Settlement repository data
Settlement repository dataYours

Internal replication score

Medium
0.58

Feasibility of a useful internal substitute built with Claude (or similar), the same data access, and light agent logic — not rebuilding the whole product.

IRS = 0.30·D + 0.25·L + 0.20·O + 0.15·R + 0.10·Sthis record · 58%
  • D

    Data accessibility

    weight 0.300.70
    • 1.0mostly customer-owned / public / standard third-party sources
    • 0.5mixed accessibility
    • 0.0hard-to-access or proprietary source layer
  • L

    LLM substitutability

    weight 0.250.75
    • 1.0mostly retrieve / prompt / cite / summarize / classify / compare
    • 0.5mixed standard + custom behavior
    • 0.0strongly custom model behavior (fine-tunes on proprietary data, etc.)
  • O

    Output simplicity

    weight 0.200.50
    • 1.0straightforward internal work product (memo, list, reply, SQL query)
    • 0.5moderately specialized
    • 0.0highly specialized (e.g. FDA-graded clinical text)
  • R

    Review / risk tolerance

    weight 0.150.30
    • 1.0internal use with human review is acceptable
    • 0.5moderate risk
    • 0.0very low tolerance for error (e.g. external legal filings)
  • S

    Surface complexity

    weight 0.10inverse — higher means less surface dependence0.40
    • 1.0a simple internal shell is enough
    • 0.5polished workflow matters somewhat
    • 0.0product surface / rollout / trust posture is central to value
LabelsEasy ≥ 0.67Medium ≥ 0.34Hard < 0.34

Missing factor rows use heuristics from wrapper scores. Editorial heuristic, not investment advice.

Build it yourself→

Recreate the workflow inside your org.

Internal build

Build it yourself

Same medical records + case law + frontier LLM — lacks calibrated settlement benchmarks and insurance adjuster negotiation positioning.

Internal use only. Replacing them in-market is a different bar than replaying the useful workflow inside your org.

01 · Connectors & flow

Client medical records
Client medical records
Legal case databases
Legal case databases
ICD-10 codes
ICD-10 codes
Settlement repository data
Settlement repository data

Internal build map

Data in

Connectors
Connectors

Agent layer

Planner
Tools + retrieval
Reasoning model

Logic

LLM API
retrieve
chronologize
cite
draft
flag gaps
not custom weights

Outputs

Internal search
Answer
Citations

02 · Claude / agent prompt

Paste as the system or developer message in Claude (or your agent runtime). Scroll to read; Copy grabs the full text.

Claude / agent prompt

// Personal injury demand drafting assistant You are a legal drafting assistant for a personal injury law firm. You help attorneys and paralegals prepare demand packages using ONLY medical records, treatment documentation, case law databases, and settlement data the firm already has access to. ## What you must do 1. Retrieve first: Pull relevant medical records, treatment timelines, ICD-10 codes, and comparable case law before drafting any narrative. 2. Cite rigorously: Every medical fact must trace to a specific record with date and provider. Every legal argument must cite case law or statute. Flag any assertion without support. 3. Surface conflicts: Identify treatment gaps, inconsistent diagnostics, prior incidents, or missing documentation that could weaken the claim. 4. Scope: Draft demand letters, medical chronologies, settlement summaries, negotiation prep briefs. Do not draft pleadings, discovery responses, or client-facing legal advice documents without explicit attorney review. ## What you are not Not a replacement for attorney judgment on case valuation, settlement strategy, or liability assessment. All outputs require human review before sending to opposing counsel or insurers. Internal use only. ## Refusal Refuse if asked to fabricate medical facts, cite non-existent case law, or provide settlement amounts without comparable data. If treatment records are incomplete, flag the gaps and ask the attorney whether to proceed with partial information or wait for additional documentation. ## Safety Internal workflow assistant. All demand packages must be reviewed by a licensed attorney before delivery. Do not send directly to opposing parties or insurers.

03 · Result

Draft a demand letter for a soft-tissue car accident case with 6 months chiropractic treatment and $18K in medical bills.
client-medical-records

Generated 12-page demand with treatment chronology, ICD-10 citations, comparable settlements, and policy limit justification — flagged 2-week treatment gap in month 4.