MAGIC

Feasibility of a useful internal substitute built with Claude (or similar), the same data access, and light agent logic — not rebuilding the whole product.

• D

  Data accessibility

  weight 0.300.85
  • 1.0mostly customer-owned / public / standard third-party sources
  • 0.5mixed accessibility
  • 0.0hard-to-access or proprietary source layer
• L

  LLM substitutability

  weight 0.250.20
  • 1.0mostly retrieve / prompt / cite / summarize / classify / compare
  • 0.5mixed standard + custom behavior
  • 0.0strongly custom model behavior (fine-tunes on proprietary data, etc.)
• O

  Output simplicity

  weight 0.200.70
  • 1.0straightforward internal work product (memo, list, reply, SQL query)
  • 0.5moderately specialized
  • 0.0highly specialized (e.g. FDA-graded clinical text)
• R

  Review / risk tolerance

  weight 0.150.80
  • 1.0internal use with human review is acceptable
  • 0.5moderate risk
  • 0.0very low tolerance for error (e.g. external legal filings)
• S

  Surface complexity

  weight 0.10inverse — higher means less surface dependence0.40
  • 1.0a simple internal shell is enough
  • 0.5polished workflow matters somewhat
  • 0.0product surface / rollout / trust posture is central to value

Missing factor rows use heuristics from wrapper scores. Editorial heuristic, not investment advice.